Stories about books and articles. Thoughts on Asia, South Korea and Southeast Asia in particular
Friday, January 12, 2024
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impact on Singapore and Indonesia(49)
Sunday, November 19, 2023
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impact on Singapore and Indonesia(30)
Monday, May 29, 2023
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia(51)
Friday, December 16, 2022
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia(38)
Comparative Study on the Perception and Response of Singapore and Indonesia
As identified above, Singapore and Indonesia may have been claimed to pour continuous efforts to cope with the era of the AEC. Both countries have concentrated on the advent of the AEC and the impacts that the new regional economic community would bring to them.
Nevertheless, there are yet complaints especially from the private sectors in both countries that incomplete information sharing and insufficient corporate engagement on the core agendas of the AEC has been left shortages.
Monday, September 12, 2022
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia(47)
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia
In general, Singapore is appraised more prepared to explore the age of the AEC than Indonesia. Private sectors in Singapore, especially SMES have been aggressive in broadening their horizons across the region to excavate new growth chances.
However, the future of the AEC may be overshadowed unless Indonesia fails to utterly nudge itself to the AEC. Then rosy pictures on the AEC where skilled labor forces in various fields will freely crossing the borders may turn out a wishful thinking.
Wednesday, August 3, 2022
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia(30)
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia
A more basic reaction from businesses is tied to the process itself of drawing up the ASEAN economic agreements. An underlying concern is that the agreements are concluded without the involvement of or consultation with the private sector.
Consequently, there is lack of familiarity or limited knowledge of the workings and details of the agreements and their impact on business. Going forward, Singapore will focus on capacity building and human resource development in the ASEAN countries to help them prepare for the 2015 deadline.
Monday, July 11, 2022
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia(25)
Advent of the Era of the AEC and Its Impacts on Singapore and Indonesia
The 4 papers are 'Deadline 2015: Assessing Indonesia's Progress towards the AEC' by Hadi Soesastro and Raymond Atje, 'Role of the Singapore Private Sector in ASEAN Economic Integration' by Juliana Giam, ASEAN Economic Integration: Perspectives from Singapore' by Ong Keng Yong and 'Perspective of the Indonesian Business Sector on the Regional Integration Process' by Widdi Mugijayani and Pratiwi Kartika.
Relied upon the findings from the papers, SWOT analysis can be further applied for both countries.
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
Japan’s move to protect geographical brands(13)
It is manufacturing and entertainment industry which has generated most disputes over the intellectual property rights between Korea and China. Except a few cases surrounding the use of geographical brands for Korean rice and hot pepper sauce in America, geographical brands haven’t developed themselves into big issues so far in Korea.
So studies and researches also have been focused on cases of private sectors, corporate activities in particular. However, keeping the ever-growing influence of China and recent ‘Korean Wave’ frenzy in China, it is little doubt that geographical brands will become hot-potato like issues soon.
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Japan's reaction to protect geographical brands in China(9)
Monday, November 6, 2017
Japan's reaction to protect geographical brands in China(1)
As the wave of globalization is getting bigger and bigger, national economies also impact to each other more frequently. Thus, snowballing international disputes are reported here and there in the international stage.
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Japan's move to protect geographical brands(7)
It is manufacturing and entertainment industry which has generated most disputes over the intellectual property rights between Korea and China. Except a few cases surrounding the use of geographical brands for Korean rice and hot pepper sauce in America, geographical brands haven’t developed themselves into big issues so far in Korea.
So studies and researches also have been focused on cases of private sectors, corporate activities in particular. However, keeping the ever-growing influence of China and recent ‘Korean Wave’ frenzy in China, it is little doubt that geographical brands will become hot-potato like issues soon.
Needless to say, voices of requesting protection of Korean geographical brands in China will be drawing greater attention as well. In this regard, Japanese government’s recent initiatives have meaningful implication to Korea. Japan’s efforts to apply for trademarks abroad and to present guidelines at home are what Korean government should learn for its sake.
In other words, this project will address a message that Korean government need to benchmark the researched cases and to come up with necessary measures to prevent potential troubles with China with no delay.






