Study on international disputes over the intellectual property rights
Namely, the Korean court decided vividly that even if an intellectual property had been invented in a foreign nation but if a suit should be brought for its infringement or protection in Korea, the Korean law would be applied to the case according to 'lex loci protectionis.'
The fact that the Korean court applied 'lex loci protectionis' to the case based on Article 24 of Private International Law specifying "Intellectual property rights shall be protected by the law of the nation where they are infringed upon" is interpreted in such a way that 'lex loci protectionis' accepted widely in determining the governing law for the international disputes over the intellectual property rights should be more realistic.
On the other hand, a variety of international efforts are being made to unify the standards for determining the governing law for the international disputes over the intellectual property rights. The model examples of such movements are Berne Convention, Rome Convention, and the like.
Study on international disputes over the intellectual property rights
Despite the criticism that it does not properly reflect the changing international environment, 'lex loci protectionis' has provided for some important standards for resolution of the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
Accordingly, even though it is deemed necessary to introduce some concepts of 'lex loci origins' in order to interpret 'lex loci protectionis' anew, significance of 'lex loci protectionis' related to the governing law is expected to be highlighted continuously afterwards.
Such a trend is well reflected in 'Von Dutch' case. When the US designer died, companies of various nations attempted to take over his intellectual property right to use it for their trademarks. In this 'Von Dutch' case, the Korean court made it clear that it had applied 'lex loci protectionis' to the case according to territorialitatsprinzip.
Study on international disputes over the intellectual property rights
Acts and judicial precedents of nations and the international trends show us well how 'territorialitatsprinzip' has been applied to the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
When territorialitatsprinzip is reviewed, the focus of discussion may well be shifted to the governing law; which nation's law should be applied to the disputes over the international transactions?
Upon considering such principles for determining the governing law as 'lex loci protectionis,' 'lex loci origins' and 'lex fori,' it could be confirmed that 'lex loci protectionis' is being established as a primary principle.
Study on international disputes over the intellectual property rights
As the wave of a global community is stronger, the international disputes over the intellectual property rights are increasing rapidly in the international society.
Furthermore, the rapid development of communication means not limited by time and space as internet together with more convenient transportations serves to increase the international disputes over the intellectual property rights necessarily.
In such circumstances, this study focused on 'territorialitatsprinzip' and 'lex loci protectionis' both applied to the multi-national disputes over the intellectual property rights. The former principle mainly applied to determine the jurisdiction of the criminal cases has played a great role in solving the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
Study on 'Territorialitatsprinzip' and 'Lex Loci Protectionis' in the International Disputes over the Intellectual Property Rights
On the other hand, a variety of international efforts are being made to unify the standards for determining the governing law for the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
The model examples of such movements are Berne Convention, Rome Convention, and the like. WIPO, Max Planck Institute in Germany and American Law Institute have also drafted international conventions regarding the governing law.
These attempts are common in that they suggest 'lex loci protectionis' as principle for resolution of the international disputes over the intellectual property rights according to 'territorialitatsprinzip.'
Study on 'Territorialitatsprinzip' and 'Lex Loci Protectionis' in the International Disputes over the Intellectual Property Rights
Such a trend is well reflected in 'Von Dutch' case. When the US designer died, companies of various nations attempted to take over his intellectual property right to use it for their trademarks.
In this 'Von Dutch' case, the Korean court made it clear that it had applied 'lex loci protectionis' to the case according to territorialitatsprinzip.
Namely, the Korean court decided vividly that even if an intellectual property had been invented in a foreign nation but if a suit should be brought for its infringement or protection in Korea, the Korean law would be applied to the case according to 'lex loci protectionis.'
The fact that the Korean court applied 'lex loci protectionis' to the case based on Article 24 of Private International Law specifying "Intellectual property rights shall be protected by the law of the nation where they are infringed upon" is interpreted in such a way that 'lex loci protectionis' accepted widely in determining the governing law for the international disputes over the intellectual property rights should be more realistic.
Study on 'Territorialitatsprinzip' and 'Lex Loci Protectionis' in the International Disputes over the Intellectual Property Rights
When territorialitatsprinzip is reviewed, the focus of discussion may well be shifted to the governing law; which nation's law should be applied to the disputes over the international transactions?
Upon considering such principles for determining the governing law as 'lex loci protectionis,' 'lex loci origins' and 'lex fori,' it could be confirmed that 'lex loci protectionis' is being established as a primary principle.
Despite the criticism that it does not properly reflect the changing international environment, 'lex loci protectionis' has provided for some important standards for resolution of the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
Accordingly, even though it is deemed necessary to introduce some concepts of 'lex loci origins' in order to interpret 'lex loci protectionis' anew, significance of 'lex loci protectionis' related to the governing law is expected to be highlighted continuously afterwards.
Study on 'Territorialitatsprinzip' and 'Lex Loci Protectionis' in the International Disputes over the Intellectual Property Rights
As the wave of a global community is stronger, the international disputes over the intellectual property rights are increasing rapidly in the international society.
Furthermore, the rapid development of communication means not limited by time and space as internet together with more convenient transportations serves to increase the international disputes over the intellectual property rights necessarily.
In such circumstances, this study focused on 'territorialitatsprinzip' and 'lex loci protectionis' both applied to the multi-national disputes over the intellectual property rights. The former principle mainly applied to determine the jurisdiction of the criminal cases has played a great role in solving the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
Acts and judicial precedents of nations and the international trends show us well how 'territorialitatsprinzip' has been applied to the international disputes over the intellectual property rights.
